PORTFOLIO BY MATERIAL
A Menu of Lower-Carbon Choices
Six proven material families, each mapped to compliance and carbon outcomes. No greenwashing — every gram of resin accounted for.
01 · LIMESTONE COMPOUND
LIMEX
Limestone-based, low-carbon, reduced energy & water in production.
Up to -33% CO₂ vs ABS
02 · RECYCLED RESIN
ABS / PP with PCR
Post-consumer recycled content in conventional resins.
Circularity Ready
03 · BIODEGRADABLE
PHA / Bio-PP
Plant-derived and marine-degradable polymer alternatives.
100% Bio-based
04 · LIGHTWEIGHTING
Optimized Wall Thickness
Precision injection tooling designed to minimize raw polymer usage.
Up to -25% Material Mass
05 · MONO-MATERIAL
100% Polypropylene Systems
Single-stream components engineered for kerbside recyclability under PPWR.
Grade A Recyclability
06 · REPLACEABLE CARTRIDGES
Modular Refills
Durable outer luxury shells with interchangeable inner reservoirs.
Up to -70% Lifetime Carbon
LCA Carbon Comparison — Verified per SKU
gCO₂e per piece (lower is better)
LIMEX (Limestone-Based)PP (Polypropylene)ABS (Conventional Resin)
9201 Facestick: LIMEX 207.8 · PP 232.8 · ABS 301.3 gCO₂e/pc. 2077 Compact: LIMEX 171.9 vs ABS 255.0 gCO₂e/pc (-32.6%). Figures shown per specific SKU to avoid blended averages.
REFILLABLE FORMATS
Refillable systems: The biggest lever
For cosmetic packaging, a LIMEX refillable system reaches as low as 0.0157 KgCO₂e/cm³— delivering massive carbon reduction compared to an all-ABS single-use equivalent.
Trusted By Global Maisons:ShiseidoNARSLVMH Group
-243%
Lower Carbon Footprint
LIMEX Refill System vs ABS Single-Use